Theodore ๐Ÿ˜น John ๐Ÿ‘Œ Kaczinsky

INTRODUCTION ๐ŸŽฎ

1 โ—. โ โ The Industrial ๐Ÿญ Revolution ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ† and its consequences ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿค› have been a disaster ๐Ÿ˜ฑโŒ for the human ๐Ÿ‘ค race ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™€๏ธ. They have greatly ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿผ increased ๐Ÿง‚๐Ÿ˜ญ the life-expectancy of those of us ๐Ÿ‘จ who live ๐Ÿ™ in โ€œadvancedโ€ countries ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ, but ๐Ÿ‘ they have destabilized society ๐Ÿ˜ผ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿ’ฅ, have made ๐Ÿ‘‘ life ๐Ÿ‘ค unfulfilling, have subjected ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ—ฏ human ๐Ÿ‘ค beings ๐Ÿ’ฆ to indignities, have led ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿ’ฆ to widespread ๐Ÿ˜ท psychological ๐Ÿง  suffering ๐Ÿ˜ฃ๐Ÿ˜ซ๐Ÿ˜– (in the Third 3๏ธโƒฃ World ๐ŸŒ to physical ๐Ÿ‘Š suffering ๐Ÿ˜ญ as well ๐Ÿ˜ฆ) and have inflicted severe ๐Ÿ“‰ damage ๐Ÿ‘ป on ๐Ÿ”› the natural ๐ŸŒฟ world ๐ŸŒ๐ŸŒŽ๐ŸŒ. The continued โœˆ development ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ’ป of technology ๐Ÿ’ก will worsen ๐Ÿ†˜๐Ÿ˜ญ the situation ๐ŸŽฎ. It will certainly ๐Ÿ”— subject ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅโ„ human ๐Ÿ‘ค being to greater ๐Ÿ’ก indignities and inflict ๐Ÿ˜ต greater ๐Ÿ’ฏโŒ damage ๐Ÿ’ฅ on ๐Ÿ”› the natural ๐Ÿ‘‰ world ๐ŸŒŽ, it will probably ๐Ÿค” lead ๐Ÿ‘‘ to greater ๐Ÿ‘… social ๐Ÿ‘ฅ disruption ๐Ÿ˜’ and psychological ๐Ÿง  suffering ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ก, and it may ๐Ÿ—“โ™€ lead ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿ’ฆ to increased ๐Ÿง‚๐Ÿ˜ญ physical ๐Ÿ‘Š suffering ๐Ÿ˜ญ even ๐ŸŒƒ in โ€œadvancedโ€ countries ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ. 2 ๐Ÿ•. โ โ The industrial-technological system ๐Ÿ—บ may ๐Ÿ—“ survive ๐Ÿ™ or it may ๐Ÿ—“ break ๐Ÿ’” down ๐Ÿ”ป. If it survives ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿผ๐Ÿ˜ฉ๐Ÿ˜ญ, it MAY ๐Ÿ—“ eventually ๐Ÿ”ช๐Ÿ—ก achieve ๐Ÿ’ฏโœ” a low ๐Ÿ‘‡ level ๐ŸŽš of physical ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ˜ค and psychological ๐Ÿง  suffering ๐Ÿ˜ญ, but ๐Ÿค” only after ๐Ÿ‘€ passing ๐Ÿ’ฏ through a long ๐Ÿ•š and very ๐Ÿ‘Œ painful ๐Ÿ”ช period ๐Ÿฉธ of adjustment ๐Ÿ’ฐ and only at the cost ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ’ต๐Ÿ’ด of permanently ๐Ÿ“’ reducing โฌ๐Ÿ˜œ human ๐Ÿ‘ค beings ๐Ÿ’ฆ and many ๐Ÿ‘ฌ other living ๐Ÿ™… organisms โ™ป to engineered โš™ products ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿ”จ๐Ÿ”ง and mere ๐Ÿซ cogs in the social ๐Ÿ“– machine ๐Ÿค–. Furthermore โ˜, if the system ๐Ÿ—บ survives ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿผ๐Ÿ˜ฉ๐Ÿ˜ญ, the consequences ๐Ÿ™Š๐Ÿ™€ will be inevitable ๐Ÿ˜ณ๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ˜จ: There is no ๐Ÿ™…๐Ÿฟโ€โ™‚๏ธโŒ way โ†• of reforming or modifying the system ๐Ÿ—บ so as to prevent ๐Ÿšซ it from depriving people ๐Ÿ‘ซ๐Ÿ—‘ of dignity ๐Ÿ™ and autonomy. 3 โญ•โ„น๐Ÿ•˜. โ โ If the system ๐Ÿ—บ breaks ๐Ÿ’” down โฌ‡ the consequences ๐Ÿ™Š๐Ÿ™€ will still ๐Ÿ™„ be very ๐Ÿ‘Œ painful ๐Ÿ˜ญ. But ๐Ÿ‘ the bigger ๐Ÿ˜ณ๐Ÿ˜ฒ the system ๐Ÿ—บ grows ๐Ÿ’— the more disastrous ๐Ÿ˜ฑ the results ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ’ฏ of its breakdown ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ™€ will be, so if it is to break ๐Ÿ’” down โฌ‡ it had best ๐Ÿ‘Œ break ๐Ÿ’” down โฌ‡ sooner ๐Ÿ•› rather ๐Ÿ‘‰ than later ๐Ÿ•‘. 4 ๐Ÿ’ฆ. โ โ We therefore ๐Ÿ˜ค๐Ÿ˜ก advocate ๐Ÿšซ a revolution ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ† against ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿšซ the industrial ๐Ÿญ system ๐Ÿ—บ. This revolution ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ† may ๐Ÿ—“ or may ๐Ÿ—“ not make ๐Ÿ’˜ use ๐Ÿ˜ of violence ๐Ÿ’ฃ; it may ๐Ÿ—“ be sudden ๐Ÿ˜ฑ or it may ๐Ÿ—“ be a relatively ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ‘งโ€๐Ÿ‘ง gradual ๐Ÿ“ process ๐Ÿญ spanning ๐Ÿ™ a few decades ๐Ÿ—“. We canโ€™t predict ๐Ÿค” any of that. But ๐Ÿ‘ we do outline ๐Ÿ“„ in a very ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿ˜” general ๐Ÿคท way ๐Ÿ’ซ the measures ๐Ÿ“ that those who hate ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ–• the industrial ๐Ÿ› ๐Ÿญ system โ˜„ should take ๐Ÿ‘Š in order ๐Ÿ“‘ to prepare ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿพ the way ๐Ÿ’ซ for a revolution ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ† against ๐Ÿšซ that form ๐Ÿ“‹ of society ๐Ÿ‘ฅ. This is not to be a POLITICAL ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ revolution โœŠโš”. Its object ๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿค™ will be to overthrow โœŠ not governments ๐Ÿ’ฉ but ๐Ÿ‘ the economic ๐Ÿ“‰ and technological ๐Ÿ’ก basis ๐Ÿ“… of the present ๐ŸŽ society ๐Ÿคต๐Ÿ‘ฅ๐ŸŒƒ. 5 ๐Ÿ”ณ. โ โ In this article ๐Ÿ“„ we give ๐ŸŽ attention โš  to only some of the negative ๐Ÿ‘Ž developments ๐Ÿš€ that have grown ๐Ÿ’ช out of the industrial-technological system ๐Ÿ—บ. Other such developments ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ’ป we mention ๐Ÿ—ฃ only briefly ๐Ÿ˜Ž or ignore ๐Ÿ’ฉ altogether. This does not mean ๐Ÿ˜ that we regard ๐Ÿค”โค these other developments ๐Ÿš€ as unimportant. For practical ๐Ÿ˜š reasons ๐Ÿค” we have to confine โš— our discussion ๐Ÿ—ฃ๐Ÿ‘„ to areas โš ๐Ÿ’€ that have received ๐Ÿ’Œ insufficient ๐ŸŒก๐Ÿฅต๐ŸŒŠ public ๐Ÿš‹ attention โš  or in which we have something ๐Ÿ˜… new ๐Ÿ†• to say ๐Ÿ—ฃ. For example ๐Ÿ’ช, since ๐Ÿ‘จ there are well-developed environmental ๐ŸŒ and wilderness ๐Ÿป movements ๐Ÿ“ฆ, we have written โœ’๐Ÿ–Œ very ๐Ÿ‘Œ little ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿ‘– about ๐Ÿ’ฆ environmental ๐ŸŒ degradation ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ‘Œ or the destruction ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ”ซ of wild ๐Ÿป nature ๐ŸŒฒ, even ๐ŸŒƒ though ๐Ÿ’ฅ we consider ๐Ÿค” these to be highly โฌ†๐Ÿ’Š๐Ÿ•› important ๐Ÿ”.

THE PSYCHOLOGY ๐Ÿง  OF MODERN ๐Ÿ–ฅ LEFTISM ๐Ÿคฎ

6 ๐Ÿ•ก. Almost ๐Ÿ’ฆ everyone ๐Ÿ‘ฅ will agree ๐Ÿ˜‚โœ…๐Ÿ’ฏ that we live ๐Ÿ™ in a deeply ๐Ÿ˜ฑ troubled ๐Ÿ˜ง society ๐Ÿ˜ผ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿ’ฅ. One ๐Ÿ˜ค๐Ÿ‘ผ of the most widespread ๐Ÿ˜ท manifestations ๐Ÿ˜ˆ of the craziness ๐Ÿคช of our world ๐ŸŒŽ is leftism ๐Ÿคฎ, so a discussion ๐Ÿค” of the psychology ๐Ÿง  of leftism ๐Ÿ†˜ can serve ๐Ÿ’ as an introduction ๐ŸŽฎ to the discussion ๐Ÿค” of the problems ๐Ÿ˜Š of modern ๐Ÿ–ฅ society ๐Ÿ‘ฅ in general ๐Ÿ’‚. 7 ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ˜‚. But ๐Ÿค” what is leftism ๐Ÿ†˜? During the first ๐Ÿฅ‡ half ๐Ÿ’€ of the 20th ๐Ÿ’ฏ๐ŸŽ‚ century ๐Ÿ’ฏ leftism โฌ… could have been practically โค identified with socialism ๐Ÿšซ. Today ๐Ÿ“… the movement ๐Ÿ‘ฃ is fragmented and it is not clear ๐Ÿ˜‹๐Ÿ˜‰ who can properly ๐Ÿ‘Œ be called ๐Ÿ“ฒ a leftist ๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ˜…๐Ÿ˜ˆ. When โฐ we speak ๐Ÿ™Š of leftists โฌ… in this article ๐Ÿ“ฐ we have in mind ๐Ÿง  mainly ๐Ÿ˜ท socialists ๐Ÿšซ, collectivists, โ€œpolitically correctโ€ types ๐Ÿ’ป, feminists โ™€, gay ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ and disability โ™ฟ๐Ÿ˜œ activists ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ’ฆ, animal ๐Ÿถ rights โœ” activists ๐Ÿ‘ค and the like ๐Ÿ’–. But ๐Ÿ‘ not everyone ๐Ÿ‘ฅ who is associated โœ…โ†” with one โ˜ of these movements ๐Ÿ‘ฃ is a leftist ๐Ÿ˜Ž. What we are trying ๐Ÿ˜ˆ to get ๐Ÿ”Ÿ at in discussing ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜  leftism โฌ… is not so much ๐Ÿ”ฅ movement ๐Ÿ“ฆ or an ideology ๐Ÿ’ฏ๐Ÿšซ as a psychological ๐Ÿค• type ๐Ÿ’ป, or rather ๐Ÿ˜ฎ๐Ÿ’ญ a collection ๐Ÿคค of related ๐Ÿ‘ช types โŒจ๐Ÿ“. Thus ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ’…, what we mean ๐Ÿ˜ by โ€œleftismโ€ will emerge ๐Ÿ†˜๐Ÿšจ more clearly ๐Ÿ˜‹๐Ÿ˜‰ in the course ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜ค of our discussion ๐Ÿค” of leftist โฌ… psychology ๐Ÿค•. (Also ๐Ÿ‘จ, see ๐Ÿ‘ paragraphs ๐Ÿ“•๐Ÿ“˜ 227-230.) 8 ๐Ÿ‘Š. Even ๐ŸŒƒ so, our conception ๐Ÿค” of leftism ๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ˜…๐Ÿ˜ˆ will remain ๐Ÿ˜ฅ a good ๐Ÿ‘Œ deal ๐Ÿ™… less โž– clear ๐Ÿ˜‹๐Ÿ˜‰ than we would wish ๐Ÿ™, but ๐Ÿ‘ there doesnโ€™t seem ๐Ÿ‘€ to be any remedy ๐Ÿ’Š๐Ÿ’‰๐Ÿจ for this. All ๐Ÿ’ฏ we are trying ๐Ÿ˜ผ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿ’ฅ to do here is indicate ๐Ÿ’ฃ in a rough ๐Ÿ˜– and approximate ๐Ÿค“ way ๐Ÿ’ซ the two โœŒ psychological ๐Ÿง  tendencies ๐Ÿ— that we believe ๐ŸŒˆ are the main ๐Ÿ…ฑ driving ๐Ÿš—๐Ÿš• force ๐Ÿ– of modern ๐Ÿ•ธ leftism ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคซ๐Ÿ˜‚. We by no ๐Ÿ™… means ๐Ÿ˜ claim ๐ŸŒŠ to be telling ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ—ฃ the WHOLE ๐Ÿ’ฆ truth ๐Ÿ’ฏ about ๐Ÿ’ฆ leftist ๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ˜…๐Ÿ˜ˆ psychology ๐Ÿค•. Also ๐Ÿ‘จ, our discussion ๐Ÿ—ฃ๐Ÿ‘„ is meant ๐Ÿ‘€ to apply ๐Ÿ“„ to modern ๐Ÿ–ฅ leftism โฌ… only. We leave ๐Ÿƒ๐Ÿ open ๐Ÿ˜ƒ the question โ“ of the extent ๐Ÿ‘€ to which our discussion ๐Ÿ—ฃ๐Ÿค” could be applied ๐Ÿ‘€ to the leftists ๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ˜…๐Ÿ˜ˆ of the 19th ๐Ÿค” and early ๐Ÿ• 20th ๐Ÿ’ฏ๐ŸŽ‚ centuries ๐Ÿ’ฏโ€ผ๐ŸŽŸ. 9 ๐Ÿ’ฏ. The two ๐Ÿ’ psychological ๐Ÿง  tendencies ๐Ÿ— that underlie mo ๐Ÿ…ฑ- dern leftism โฌ… we call ๐Ÿ“ฒ โ€œfeelings of inferiorityโ€ and โ€œover-socializationโ€. Feelings ๐Ÿ˜ of inferiority โŒ are characteristic ๐Ÿ”ฃ of modern ๐Ÿ–ฅ leftism โฌ… as a whole ๐Ÿ’ฆ, while oversocialization is characteristic ๐Ÿ”ฃ only of a certain ๐Ÿ”— segment of modern ๐Ÿ•ธ leftism ๐Ÿคฎ as a whole ๐Ÿ’ฆ๐Ÿ˜; but ๐Ÿค” this segment is highly ๐Ÿ•› influential ๐Ÿ™ƒ.